Darrell shared with us the following statistics for short-term missionaries in the US
1965 under 10,000
1989 120,000
1994 200,000
2005 1,600,000
That's some growth and my first reaction was to rejoice that so many people are offering for mission service. But then Darrell started asking his questions! If most of these 1.6 million Christians are abroad for just 2-4 weeks can they really be effective in mission? What do they understand about their host culture? How do they build deep relationships? Is this more about enriching the experience to US Christians (no bad thing!) rather than mission in Bolivia or wherever? Should we not be honest and call this "cross-cultural exposure" not "mission"?
Just as I was coming to terms with these questions, wrestling with the concept of 'ecclesiastical tourism', Darrell went on to ask even harder questions ...... If 1.6 million short-termers contribute 192 million hours of free labour to local projects across the world is that not a good thing? But what effect does that have on the local economy? How does this help to build partnership rather than dependancy? If 1.6 million Americans had stayed at home instead and sent the US$4.8 billion that they would otherwise have spent (on air fares, accommodation, food, etc.) to the local church what might that have purchased in the local economy?
There are no easy answers but it does make me wonder whether Christians have bought into the 'short-termism' of our contemporary culture and whether anyone will ever again want to do anything long-term.
None of these questions are new, but they need to be asked again ang again. My question is - what difference does it also make - in the world - to those who go for 2-3 weeks. Is it life changing for them and therefore does it deeply impact the rest of their vocational journey? Or does it justify a globetrotting consumer holiday?
ReplyDeleteMy 17 year old has just spent 2 such weeks in Romania and it has been interesting to hear her reflections on her experience and those of her fellow travellers.